DEVELOPMENTAL STATE AND THE QUESTION OF ACCOUNTABILITY
ANALYSING THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM ON THE DERELICTION OF PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT
Abstract
In South Africa, despite what appears to be a perfectly designed political system underpinned by the separation of powers, there seemingly is a lack of accountability of public officials that has its roots in the proportional representation (PR) electoral system. This study postulates that this has proven not to be effective in terms of accountability and oversight as far as the implementation of Chapter 13 of NDP and the broader objectives of South Africa’s development framework. The infamous Nkandla Projects and Parliamentary Inquiry into Eskom make for a worthy case study in this endeavour for at least one particular reason, these two case studies and all that came to encompass them extended over period adequately lengthy enough to check the consistency of Parliament and how South Africa’s electoral system leads to and breeds systemic political corruption that Parliament cannot decisively address and deal with. Furthermore, this study will argue how the Electoral Amendment Bill (B1-2022) could be effective in improving how MPs are delegated, held accountable and increasing state capacity through Parliamentary oversight.
Downloads
References
Africa Check. (2016). A Compendium of Nkandla Reports & Court Papers. Retrieved from https://africacheck.org/how-to-fact-check/factsheets-and-guides/a-compendium-of-nkandla-reports-court-papers/
Bailie, C. (2017). The RARE Leadership Model, Jacob Zuma, and Nkandla: Thoughts on the Virtues of Leadership. Politeia, 36(1), 1-23.
Botha, C. (2019). Time for Electoral Reform and Dusting Off the Van Zyl Slabbert Report. Retrieved from https://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/time-for-electoral-reform-and-dusting-off-the-van-
Center for Human Rights. (2016, August 17). The South African Electoral System: Time to Revisit the Van Zyl Slabbert Report? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHVILghRSYY&t=2209s
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. (1996). Act 108, 1996. Date of Promulgation: December 18, 1996.
Constitutional Court Judgement. (2016, March 31). Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others; Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others. Cases CCT 143/15 and CCT 171/15.
Constitutional Court Judgement. (2020, June 11). New Nation Movement NPC and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (CCT110/19) [2020] ZACC 11; 2020 (8) BCLR 950 (CC); 2020 (6) SA 257 (CC).
Day, P., & Klein, R. (1987). Accountabilities: Five Public Services. Tavistock.
De Vos, P. (2017, April 20). How South Africa’s Electoral System Effectively Disenfranchises Voters. The Daily Maverick. Retrieved from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2017-04-20-how-south-africas-electoral-system-effectively-disenfranchises-voters/
Hudson, A., & Wren, C. (2007). Parliamentary Strengthening in Developing Countries. Overseas Development Institute, Final Report for DFID.
Judicial Inquiry in State Capture Report. (2022). Part IV: State Capture Established President Ramaphosa’s Evidence and the Role of the ANC and Parliamentary Oversight.
Keohane, R. O. (2003). The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force. Michigan Journal of International Law, 24(4), 1123-1141.
Laver, M., & Shepsle, K. A. (1999). Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Levy, M. (2022). How Parliament Failed – And Zondo’s Respectful Advice to Our Legislators. South African Journal of Social and Economic Policy, 2022(86), 6-11.
Louw, W. (2014). Electoral Reform and South Africa. The Journal of the Helen Suzman Foundation, 74, 19-25.
Makgaole, O. (2017, October 13). When Will We Wake Up and Reform Our Crooked Electoral System? The Daily Maverick. Retrieved from https://www-dailymaverick-co-za.webpkgcache.com/doc/-/s/www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2017-10-13-when-will-we-wake-up-and-reform-our-crooked-electoral-system/
Mandela, N. (1999, March 26). Address by Nelson Mandela at Final Sitting of First Democratically Elected Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.mandela.gov.za/mandela_speeches/1999/990326_parlfinal.htm
Matsebe-Nolutshwana, K. M. (2019). A Critical Analysis of the Oversight Role and Function of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) in Promoting Accountability in South Africa’s Public Sector. Doctoral Thesis, University of Pretoria.
Moser, R. G., & Scheiner, E. (2004). Mixed Electoral Systems and Electoral System Effects: Controlled Comparison and Cross-National Analysis. Electoral Studies, 23(2004), 575-599.
National Planning Commission. (2012). Our Future – Make it Work: National Development Plan.
Newell, P., & Bellour, S. (2002). Mapping Accountability: Origins, Contexts and Implications for Development. Institute for Development Studies.
Pelizzo, R., & Stapenhurst, R. (2006). Democracy and Oversight. In R. Pelizzo, R. Stapenhurst, & O. Olson (Eds.), Parliamentary Oversight for Government Accountability. World Bank Institute.
Piombo, J., & Nijzink L. (2005). Electoral Politics in South Africa: Assessing the First Democratic Decade. Palgrave Macmillan.
Presidential Handbook. (2015). On Support For The President, His Or Her Spouse And Dependent Children, And The Deputy President And His Or Her Spouse. Presidency of the Republic of South Africa.
Public Protector. (1994). Act 23. Assented to November 16; Date of Commencement: November 25
Warioba, I, M. (2011). The First-Past-The-Post Electoral System Versus Proportional Representation In Africa: A Comparative Analysis. A dissertation - LLM (Human Rights and Democratization in Africa - Eduardo Mondlane University Mozambique.
West, W, F., & Cooper, J. (1989). Legislative Influence V Presidential Dominance: Competing Models of Bureaucratic Control, Political Science Quarterly, 104(4): 581-606.
Copyright (c) 2023 Vusimuzi Gumbi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
