GEOPOLITICAL ISSUE ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSIA - UKRAINE WAR FROM AN INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR AUSTRALIA
Abstract
The invasion of Ukraine by Russia has become a critical point of international discourse, significantly affecting global stability and reshaping regional security dynamics. This paper analyzes the conflict through a geopolitical lens, focusing on its historical context, strategic implications, and global impact, with particular attention to Australia. The study traces the complex Russia-Ukraine relationship from the Soviet era to the present, highlighting the historical factors that have shaped their actions, responses, and global consequences. The paper also explores the concept of hybrid warfare, examining Russia’s use of conventional and unconventional tactics, such as cyber-attacks, propaganda, and proxy forces. Furthermore, the research investigates the economic dynamics within the energy sector involving Russia, Ukraine, and the European Union, analyzing shifts in energy dependence due to regional geopolitical changes and their implications for Australia’s energy security. The economic impact of the conflict on global markets and supply chains, particularly concerning Australia, is also discussed. By employing geopolitical theory, the analysis delves into the motivations behind Russia’s actions and the subsequent international response, including Australia’s strategic positioning and defense considerations. The paper concludes that the Russia-Ukraine conflict marks a significant shift in global power dynamics, presents new challenges to traditional security frameworks, and underscores the need to reevaluate international norms and alliances. This study emphasizes the complexity of modern conflicts that intertwine military, economic, and information warfare, and advocates for a redefined international relations landscape to address the challenges of the 21st century, with a focus on Australia’s role in these developments.
Downloads
References
Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Consumer Price Index, Australia. Retrieved from [ABS website].
Bremmer, I. (2013). Every nation for itself: What happens when no one leads the world. Penguin.
Charap, S., & Colton, T. J. (2017). Everyone loses: The Ukraine crisis and the ruinous contest for post-Soviet Eurasia. Routledge.
Chen, M., & Taylor, J. (2024). Trade implications of global conflicts: An Australian perspective. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(2), 45-62.
Crawford, R., & Melleuish, G. (2020). The dynamics of international relations. Australian Journal of International Affairs.
Davies, M., & Nicholson, B. (2023). Australia’s strategic response to global conflicts. Australian Strategic Policy Institute Special Report.
Department of Defence. (2023). Defence strategic review. Retrieved from [Defence website].
Drezner, D. W. (2008). All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton University Press.
Energy Security Board. (2023). Energy security in Australia: Strategies for the future. Retrieved from [ESB website].
Galeotti, M. (2016). Hybrid warfare: A soldier’s guide to the modern battlefield. Osprey Publishing.
Goldman, M. I. (2008). Petrostate: Putin, power and the new Russia. Oxford University Press.
Gregory Claeys. (2000). The "Survival of the Fittest" and the origins of social Darwinism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 61(2), 223-240.
Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
Lacoste, Y. (2012). Géopolitique: La longue histoire d’aujourd’hui. Larousse.
Lanoszka, A. (2016). Russian hybrid warfare and extended deterrence in Eastern Europe. International Affairs, 92(1), 175-195.
Leonard, T. C. (2009). Origins of the myth of social Darwinism: The ambiguous legacy of Richard Hofstadter’s social Darwinism in American thought. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 37–51.
Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421-437.
Mahan, A. T. (1890). The influence of sea power upon history. Little, Brown and Co.
Marshall I. Goldman. (2008). Petrostate: Putin, power and the new Russia. Oxford University Press.
Mason Willrich. (1978). Energy and world politics. The Free Press.
Mazarr, M. J. (2015). Mastering the gray zone: Understanding a changing era of conflict. Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press.
Medcalf, R., & Brown, J. (2024). Australia’s security in an age of strategic competition. Lowy Institute Papers.
Pirani, S., Sharples, J., Yafimava, K., & Yermakov, V. (2018). The Russian gas transit through Ukraine after 2019: The options. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
Russett, B., & Starr, H. (1981). World politics: The menu for choice. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Russia and Eurasia Program, Center for Strategic & International Studies. (2016).
Russian history: Russia after the Soviet Union. Retrieved from http://russiapedia.rt.com/russian-history/new-russia-emerges/
Sakwa, R. (2020). Russia’s futures: The politics of the present. Palgrave Macmillan.
Snyder, T. (2018). The causes of the Russo-Ukrainian war: A reflection. Foreign Affairs.
Thompson, K., et al. (2024). Energy security and global conflicts. Journal of Australian Foreign Affairs, 15(1), 23-41.
Wesley, M., & Blaxland, J. (2023). Australia’s strategic challenges in the Indo-Pacific. Melbourne University Press.
White, H. (2024). Australia’s China choice: Responding to a rising power. Black Inc.
Widayanto, S., et al. (2023). Politik perdagangan Indonesia: Problematika, pemikiran dan realitasnya. Unisri Press.
Willrich, M. (1978). Energy and world politics. The Free Press.
Zevelev, I. (2016). Russian national identity and foreign policy. CSIS Report.
Copyright (c) 2024 Irma Indrayani, Robi Nurhadi, Ni Luh Pingkan Amalia Pratama Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
