IS INDONESIA LOSING THE SOUL OF ITS DEMOCRACY?
A Look at 11 Year Trend of Indonesian Democracy
Abstract
This paper describes 11 year dynamics and trends of Indonesian democracy, specifically, aspects of Civil Liberty, Political Rights, and Democratic Institutions, through the results of Indonesia Democracy Index’s (IDI) annual assessment. IDI is an assessment of provincial democracy. Its calculation is based on events occurring throughout the year; it is an attempt to capture democracy from the ground up; a depiction of democracy as it is practiced in everyday life at the institutional as well as at behavioral level. The results indicate complex dynamics and trends where issues of civil liberty, political rights and democratic institutions intertwine to shape political reality on the ground. Discrepancies of performances between IDI’s indicators of democracy indicate a certain paradox in Indonesian democracy as it is practiced at the provincial level. On one hand, the space for civil liberty is open and the citizens are freely and enthusiastically express themselves; and on the other hand, democratic institutions are lacking in capacity and cannot respond adequately to the democratic demands arising from the opening up of civil liberty. More than a decade long abject performance of provincial parliaments across Indonesia in performing its legislative roles (i.e. initiating legislation and giving public policy recommendation to the executives) have no doubt contributed to dissatisfactions express in many public complaints and demonstrations throughout Indonesia. This lack of parliamentary capacity across Indonesia translates into the absence of representation.
Downloads
References
Crouch, Collin. (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2004.
Dahl, Robert. (1971). “Poliarchy: Participation and Opposition”. Yale University Press. New Haven, CT.
Fraser, Nancy. (2019.) “The Old is Dying and The New Cannot Be Born”. Verso. NY. NY.
Gismar, Abdul Malik. 2011. “After the Big Bang: Governance in Indonesia Democratic Transition”. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Politik. vol. 7. no. 2, (2011).
Gismar, Abdul Malik. (2010). “Kewarganegaraan dan Kebangsaan”. In Gismar and Hidayat. Half Baked Reform. Teraju, Jakarta.
Hidayat, Syarif. (2007). "Too much too soon: local state elite's perspective on and the puzzle of contemporary Indonesian regional autonomy policy”. Rajawali Press. Jakarta.
Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (2019): Dua Dekade Reformasi – Potret Capaian dan Tantangan Konsolidasi Demokrasi. Kemenkopolhukam.
Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (2017): Citra Demokrasi Minim Kapasitas. Kemenkopolhukam.
Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (2014): Ketimpangan Antara Institusi dan Kultur Demokrasi Kemenkopolhukam.
Migdal, Joel (2003), State In Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rustow, Dunkwart. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: toward a dynamic model”, in Lisa Anderson, Transitions to Democracy, Columbia University Press, NY.
Sandel, M. 1996. “Democracy and Its Discontent: America in Search of Public Philosophy”. Harvard University Press , Cambridge, MA.
Von Beyme, K. (2018). From Post-Democracy to Neo-Democracy. Springer International Publishing.
Copyright (c) 2021 Abdul Malik Gismar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
