COMPARISON OF THE POLITICAL DYNASTY IN BANTEN PROVINCE WITH THE POLITICAL DYNASTY IN CENTRAL MALUKU DISTRICT

Rahmat  Sufajar; Aberar  Guridno

doi:10.52166/jsps.v2i3.68

Rahmat Sufajar Universitas Nasional (UNAS), Jakarta
Aberar Guridno Universitas Nasional (UNAS), Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52166/jsps.v2i3.68

Keywords: Democracy, Local Election, Political Dynasty, Political Party

Abstract

The article of this study tries to explain political dynasties by making a comparison between political dynasties in Banten province and political dynasties in Central Maluku district. The political dynasties in these two regions have similarities in the basic framework of kinship relations, but the political dynasties in Central Maluku also show the dominance of the Hatuhaha Group in a strategic position in the social life of the people in Central Maluku and Maluku. This study also produces findings that local officials who carry out political dynasties focus on the economic and political interests of their groups and cause corruption in the management of power. In collecting data using library research method. The result showed that Political dynasties also show the weakness of political parties in the recruitment of regional leaders so that democracy at the local level is trapped by the interests of groups from the political dynasty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Djati, W. R. (2015). Revivalisme Kekuatan Familisme dalam Demokrasi: Dinasti Politik di Aras Lokal. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v18i2.3726
Effendi, W. R. (2017). KONSEP WELLFARE STATE DI INDONEISA. JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA. https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v1i1.722
Effendi, W. R. (2018). DINASTI POLITIK DALAM PEMERINTAHAN LOKAL STUDI KASUS DINASTI KOTA BANTEN. JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA. https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v2i2.1471
Efriza, E. (2016). Sistem Presidensial Pasca Amandemen Undang-undang Dasar 1945; Studi Kasus Kepemimpinan Presiden Sby dan Jokowi. Jurnal Renaissance, 1(01).
Emzir, M., & Pd, M. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Analisis data. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Firmadi, S., & Purwaningsih, T. (2016). Analisis Institusionalisasi Partai Politik Pada Pemilu Legislatif Tahun 2014. Journal of Governance and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.2016.0066
Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111
Harjanto, N. (2011). Politik Kekerabatan dan Institusionalisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia. Analisis CSIS, 40(2), 138–159.
Harriss-White, B. (2008). Market politics and climate change. Development. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2008.25
Jati, R. (2015). Wasisto.“. In Islam Populer sebagai Pencarian Identitas Muslim ….
Migdal, J. S. (2020). Strong societies and weak states. Princeton University Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif edisi revisi Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset. ISBN 979-514-051-5.
Muhtadi, B. (2018). Politik Identitas dan Mitos Pemilih Rasional. MAARIF. https://doi.org/10.47651/mrf.v13i2.23
Muhtadi, B. (2019a). Do Candidates Target Loyalists or Swing Voters? Beyond the Core- Versus Swing-Voter Debate. In Vote Buying in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6779-3_4
Muhtadi, B. (2019b). Introduction. In Vote Buying in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6779-3_1
Nazir, P. D. (2013). Metode Penelitian. Metode Penelitian, Cet, 8.
PURWANINGSIH, T., & RUBIYATI, R. (2019). POLITICAL RECRUITMENT OF FEMALE CANDIDATES IN MEETING THE QUOTA POLICY IN THE PROSPEROUS JUSTICE PARTY (PARTAI KEADILAN SEJAHTERA) OF DIY PROVINCE IN 2019. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.103108
Purwaningsih, T., & Widodo, B. E. C. (2020). The interplay of incumbency, political dinasty and corruption in indonesia: Are political dynasties the cause of corruption in Indonesia? Revista UNISCI. https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-89
Sakinah, N. (2015). Analisis perbedaan kinerja kepala daerah dengan latar belakang dinasti politik dan non dinasti politik. FE UAI-Akuntansi.
Schmitt, C. (2021). Aristocratic Elements in Modern Bourgeois-Rechtsstaat Constitutions. In Constitutional Theory. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1131cm8.29
Sidel, J. T. (2004). Bossism and democracy in the Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia. Politicising Democracy : The New Local Politics and Democratisation.
Syauket, A., & Wijanarko, D. (2021). Negara Bayangan Cenderung Korupsi, Sisi Gelap Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Publik & Kebijakan Publik (JMPKP). https://doi.org/10.36085/jmpkp.v3i1.1352
Thahir, B., Azikin, A., Nurhascaryani, P., Masrich, A., Tjenreng, M. Z. B., Cahyono, Y., & Koho, I. R. (2020). REVITALIZING THE ROLE OF REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS IN EMPOWERING TRADITIONAL MARKET TRADERS IN DKI JAKARTA. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(9), 146–154.